No Go Areas In Deutschland


Reviewed by:
Rating:
5
On 05.10.2020
Last modified:05.10.2020

Summary:

Ebenfalls werden die Games von Net Entertainment nur an groГe und seriГse Online. Um das beste aus akzeptabel. Daher hat jedes OnlineCasino ein eigenes Verfahren, denn die Themenvielfalt?

No Go Areas In Deutschland

Interview: "Es gibt in Deutschland keine No-go-Areas". BKA -Präsident Holger Münch im Interview mit dem Handelsblatt. Der Beitrag zeichnet nach, mit welchen inhaltlichen Aufladungen und Dynamiken No-go-Areas in Deutschland sowohl massenmedial als auch politisch seit ca. Gibt es in Deutschland No-Go-Areas? Was sind No-Go-Areas? Hier gibt es Antworten auf die wichtigsten Fragen. Ob es No-Go-Areas in Deutschland gibt.

No-go-Area

„Sozialer Brennpunkt“, „Ghetto“, „No-Go-Area“ – bestimmte Stadtteile gelten als Am Beispiel ausgewählter Stadtviertel in Belgien, Deutschland, Frankreich. Immer häufiger berichten Medien in Deutschland über sogenannte No-go-Areas. Auch große Teile der Bevölkerung sind davon überzeugt. Interview: "Es gibt in Deutschland keine No-go-Areas". BKA -Präsident Holger Münch im Interview mit dem Handelsblatt.

No Go Areas In Deutschland Comment on this item Video

No Go Areas in Deutschland

I do however find fault with the German Government. Their best intentions have backfired, to say the least. Perhaps a lesson is to be learned here.

Perhaps it is not worth helping those who see our generosity as a right. I do not want to sound too cold-hearted here, but sometimes the risk is too great when dealing with those who lack the basics of civilized cultural values.

This is the fault of the societies from which these refugees originate. No easy solution is to be found here. It is all too tempting to resort to repaying evil for evil.

This would only entrench the position of those who are radicalized and push those on the verge to leap into the abyss of radicalization.

I hate to say this Germany : "You made your bed, now you are just going to have to lie in it! Until the Leaders of the various Police Districts and Civic Leaders publicly admit that there is a major problem, and state that they will have to take drastic measures to regain permanent control of these No Go Zones, the problem will only continue to grow.

The Civic Authorities, the Government and Police Forces have a joint responsibility to ensure that communities are kept safe and law abiding, and they are manifestly failing in that duty, and if they continue to fail in maintaining civil order the consequences will be anarchy, with irretrievable harm to German Society.

The only solution is a harsh crack down on this lawlessness, with the ring leaders severely punished and removed from society, coupled by forced deportations of the perpetrators and any non German born citizen or resident who refuses to abide by civilised German standards behaviour and observance of the law.

No one should be entitled to a free ride on the taxpayer, who chooses to thumb their nose at the law and civilised civic norms of the society who took them in.

The ones worthy of a second chance will fall into line, those who don't should be expelled. Can one not see a little bit of Karma in this situation with the no go areas for the police.

Are these not the same gentlemen that have colluded in hiding the rapes and general lawlessness of these savages from their own people.

The same police would prosecute German people for hate speech and so called islamaphobia. The protectors now need protection from the protected.

Police forces are organised to handle normal crime, not to deal with the take-over of areas by masses of people with no fear of retribution.

In war, there are various means of vanquishing the enemy. The cheapest is by cutting off the resources of the enemy. In this case, the major resource is the social benefits - "entitlements" - granted by and paid for by working citizens and by government deficits which in turn reduce the value of of the savings and assets of the citizens.

These social benefits should be cut off, and on the other hand the invading population should be encouraged to leave, primarily by granting temporary support for the inimical population who have already left the country irrevocably.

This policy will have to be enforced by military strength: by encircling the conquered areas with sufficient force to prevent the enemy from attacking citizens.

It may entail temporary relocation of citizens to safe areas. I would agree with this answer. But first the German people must wake up and support each other and get rid of Angela Merkel's government and all the "politically correct" police chiefs.

They need draconian measures - but doesn't this strike a chill? Remember the mess they got themselves into with Hitler? They do not seem to be very good at judging their leaders sensibly.

Just say thanks to Merkel and the New World Order. How's that compassion and acceptance of other cultures without prejudice working out for you?

Merkel is becoming the ruler of chaos. Soeren Kern produces yet another problem facing Germany and the West in general.

A plague of Locusts has descended on all Western society. All the liberal lefty fools will be telling themselves that this is just people reacting to their surroundings, having fled war zones that have had a devastating effect on their lives.

Apparently they are so shocked and distressed that they have turned to crime. Organised gangs ruling their territories, just some of the signs that these poor people show when in so much distress, the first thing they do in a civilised country is choose to turn to crime.

Easy targets. The West's political class have shown weakness and by doing so they have given these people a free pass in Western society to carry on as they want.

They think they are above the law and so use large numbers when confronting the police. This is done everywhere there are Muslim communities.

Within minutes a large crowd of intimidating Muslims can be gathered to prevent police and other areas of authority carrying out their duty.

It is simply by showing kindness, and offering to help, that the Muslims automatically see these things as weakness to be even further exploited. To that end they will push the laws of the land they are in as far as they can.

The more they get away with, the more they push. This does not look good for the people, not only in Germany, but other Western countries.

The politicians are in denial and are completely deluding themselves if they think these people will become good and beneficial citizens, they are here for what they can get.

They aren't here to assimilate or fully integrate, they'll even say what the authorities want to hear, but it all means nothing!

People taking trams during the evening and nighttime describe their experiences as 'living nightmares. In Duisburg there are currently an estimated 60, Turkish Muslim residents, making it one of the most Islamized cities in Germany, as well as thousands of Bulgarians and Romanians.

Duisburg's Marxloh district, one of the most problematic in Germany, has been described as "a memorial to Germany's failed integration policy. More than half of the district's 20, inhabitants are migrants coming from 90 different countries.

The areas in question are also rocked by poverty with many inhabitants being on welfare. In Marxloh, this figure is 50 per cent. N24 said about the area: "Once Duisburg-Marxloh was a popular shopping and residential area.

Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, has refused to participate in the EU's quota plan to relocate , migrants across the continent and has even built a huge fence to seal off his country.

Earlier this year he announced his government will hold a referendum asking people: "Do you want the EU to prescribe the mandatory relocation of non-Hungarian citizens to Hungary without the approval of the Hungarian parliament?

Mr Orban believes that Brussels has no right to redraw Europe's cultural and religious identity and has positioned himself as a defender of European Christendom.

In March he said: "If we want to stop mass migration, we want to put the brakes on Brussels first. De facto no-go zones may arise in conjunction with inadequate local governance or tactical advantage.

The boundaries of de facto no-go zones are volatile and responsive to changes in security and tactical advantage. No-go zone boundaries can be negotiated between hostile parties or declared unilaterally by one side of a conflict.

Other no-go zones are undeclared or unofficial, making accurate boundary identification difficult. No-go zones in which rescue or security services are unavailable enable unrestricted lethal violence.

There has been controversy about the existence of no-go zones in various European countries, such as France and Sweden, as well as the United States.

Some politicians and commentators have falsely claimed the existence of no-go zones in areas with large populations of Muslims and immigrants, where, they claim, national law has been displaced by sharia law or where there is lawlessness.

Some have later recanted these statements, [4] [5] [6] while others have faced press scrutiny for their allegations. With no government enforcement from the British colonial government aside from a few raids by the Hong Kong Police , the Kowloon Walled City became a haven for crime and drugs.

It was only during a trial for a murder that occurred within the Walled City that the Hong Kong government was ruled to have jurisdiction there.

By this time, however, the Walled City was virtually ruled by the organised crime syndicates known as Triads.

Beginning in the s, Triad groups such as the 14K and Sun Yee On gained a stranglehold on the Walled City's countless brothels , gambling parlors , and opium dens.

The Walled City had become such a haven for criminals that police would venture into it only in large groups.

The areas' existence was a challenge to the authority of the British government. On 31 July , the British Army demolished the barricades and re-established control in Operation Motorman.

The situation was changed temporarily with the United States invasion of Afghanistan in , when the Pakistani government was supported by U. The term "no-go area" has a military origin and was first used in the context of the Bush War in Rhodesia.

The initial military strategy of the government was to seal the borders to prevent assistance to the guerrillas from other countries. However, with the end of Portuguese colonial rule in Angola and Mozambique , this became untenable and the white minority government adopted an alternative strategy "mobile counter offensive".

This involved defending only key economic areas, transport links "vital asset ground" , and the white civilian population.

The government lost control of the rest of the country to the guerilla forces, but carried out counter-guerilla operations including " free-fire attacks " in the so-called "no-go areas," [21] where white civilians were advised not to go.

In , the Venezuelan government negotiated with large criminal gangs on how to prevent violence and agreed to set up demilitarized areas as "peace zones".

How can their politicians keep getting elected, while dooming Germany to death by political correctness? I feel eventually, they will wake up and fight a war within their own borders for their own national preservation.

Good luck to them, because the longer they wait, the more people will perish. It may be an utter failure of "multiculturalism".

But it happened because of a failure to institute forward thinking, i. When you import cheap labor without the necessary investment in making the next generation an assimilated success, you are going to end up with an angry disrespectful underclass that cares nothing for "your" laws.

That investment is expensive, yet cheaper in the long run than crime wave. Keeping, or allowing them to live in virtual closed societies ghettos keeps them feeling separate from mainstream society; compounded with the current worldwide "success" of the "war on drugs" We know, and have known for more than a decade, that multiculturalism simply doesn't work.

Chancellor Merkel said, five years ago, it had "utterly failed". So why are we still accepting thousands of immigrants who have nothing but contempt for our society?

Why do we support them? Often much better than our own citizens? Why do we quietly accept Sharia Law, or no law at all, in ever growing areas of major cities throughout the West?

Apparently, attempts to discuss the issue are still "racist", or "Islamaphobic", or "far right extremism". And it's not just Europe.

Other Western democracies are facing the same problems, albeit at lower rates. I would contrast this powerful and disturbing report with some US history.

After the large migration of African-Americans during the Great Depression out of the racist American South to the urban American North, which turned out to be almost as racist and White Supremacist as the South, a troubled African-American culture of poverty, drug use, and often black-on-black crime developed.

In contrast, the terrible problems of 'immigrant' crime in German cities, and French cities and elsewhere, are primarily caused not by poverty and racism, but by militantly intolerant Islam.

In the German cities described by Soeren Kern, Islamic immigrants are met by a recklessly generous welfare system that operates not to ease their assimilation but to fund their supremacist separatism.

In America today, there are some signs of a new enlightenment as the country considers White responsibility for the down-trodden state of African-Americans in some blighted inner city ghettos.

In dramatic contrast, native Europeans need to face a culture of crime -- "a parallel culture of criminality" -- that is caused not by a supremacist culture in themselves, but in the Islamic immigrants who were let in by leaders unaware of the inevitable threat to Europe's future those immigrants would represent.

It's an open question whether they will develop the insight and political will to defend themselves from this threat before they are overwhelmed.

Indeed, because of the demographic rise of Islamic populations in Europe, it is ironically more likely that the ISIS threat will be defeated or at least contained than that the internal threat to European civilization will be overcome.

Besides the unfettered rise of Islamic populations, this is also due to the widespread recognition of the ISIS threat, while political blindness remains firmly in place regarding the threat in Europe.

The Grand Mufti was welcomed by the Germans and he advocated the final solution. Germany replaced its Jews with Muslims.

A great deal they got. Within years there will begin a civil war in Germany and other EU states. Or the EU will collapse under it own idiotic PC culture.

The balance will be restored, but over the bodies of many German natives. Unlike the Jews, who contributed to the German society, and got whacked for that, the Muslims are only dragging that society down, and are being hailed and paid with welfare funds.

Germany and other countries in the EU must immediately stop allowing Muslim immigrants from seeking asylum into their countries or their countries will not be theirs anymore.

It will become so bad that people from other countries will not be safe visiting there for business or pleasure.

This may seem cruel; but if the West, including America, desires to remain free, Muslim immigrants who do not abide by the rules, policies, and laws of the nations they are living in should be deported at once.

The Jews were not the trouble makers of the world. Just think how peaceful Europe and most of the world would be by now. Well it may be Poetic Justice after all.

I wonder just what the Jews did to have upset the Germans so much to have carried out the final solution? I await patiently to see Germany drown in it's mess.

Or are they going to have another final solution? Dr David Salinger. Here they are clearly admitting that they -- and their masters -- refuse to enforce the laws of Germany.

Yet they are calling for a ban on demonstrations against these terrorists cells that they enable.

What a shame. Germany and all of Europe murdered and expelled its Jews and welcomed the Muslim Arabs.

Germany should send those criminals back to their countries. Many apply for asylum because they are running from the law in their home countries.

The Germans better wake up and vote for the politicians who will stand for Germany. I was working in Germany in and life was safe for all people.

Those who know of the conditions in Germany after the abdication of Kaiser Wilhelm at the end of WW1 may see the parallels between the current situation and that Tip24 App to Within minutes a large crowd of intimidating Muslims can be gathered to prevent police and other areas of authority carrying out their duty. To find out more, please review our Privacy and Cookies Policy. Chancellor Merkel said, five years ago, it had "utterly failed". They will be queuing up to emigrate from Germany!!! But then we need nine, ten or eleven police cars to restore order. There has been controversy about the existence of no-go zones in various European countries, Homescapes Wie Viele Level Gibt Es as France and Sweden, as well as the United States. Longer submissions are unlikely to be published. But of course we know where we can go with the police car Some children were born in the 'homeland,' others in Germany. An early usage of the term regarding Europe was in a opinion piece by David Ignatius in The New York Timeswhere he Cricfree. about France, "Arab gangs regularly vandalize synagogues here, the North African suburbs have become no-go zones at night, and the French continue to shrug their shoulders. Loss of local control will continue to Dfb Pikal, until the military is called in, which will be too late. No-go zones in which rescue or security services are unavailable enable unrestricted lethal violence. In an article entitled "Ghetto Report Germany," Bild describes these areas as "burgeoning ghettos, parallel societies and no-go areas." They include: Berlin-Neukölln, Bremerhaven-Lehe/Bremen-Huchting, Cologne-Chorweiler, Dortmund-Nordstadt, Duisburg-Marxloh, Essen-Altenessen, Hamburg-Eidelstedt, Kaiserslautern-Asternweg, Mannheim-Neckarstadt West and Pforzheim-Oststadt. They'd been pushed to the edges of this infamous Duisburg neighborhood, dubbed a "no-go area" by some German media and politicians. Many buildings in Marxloh bear the signs of economic decline. Inside Germany's No-Go Zones: Part I - North Rhine-Westphalia "In Berlin or in the north of Duisburg there are neighborhoods where colleagues hardly dare to stop a car -- because "Once Duisburg-Marxloh was a popular shopping and residential area. Now clans claim the streets for themselves. The. Spiraling levels of violent crime perpetrated by immigrants from the Middle East and the Balkans are turning parts of Duisburg, a key German industrial city, into "areas of lawlessness" — areas. In a February interview, German Chancellor Angela Merkel stated that there are no-go areas in Germany, saying, "There are such areas and one has to call them by their name and do something about them." This came in the context of arguing for a zero-tolerance policy in German policing. Kenya.
No Go Areas In Deutschland Let them weed themselves out. The Guardian. For example, in Cape TownCape Flats was a neighborhood where many of those evicted were relocated. Wie eine Raumsemantik zwischen Politik und Massenmedien vermittelt und Räume rechter Gewalt zu Räumen ethnisierter Kriminalität werden. Hätte ich von Angsträumen gesprochen, hätte sich doch niemand darum gekümmert", sagt Plickert heute zum stern. Die mit Abstand meisten Straftaten entfallen auf Essenes folgen GelsenkirchenRecklinghausenDuisburgBochum und Dortmund
No Go Areas In Deutschland

Spielen Sie No Go Areas In Deutschland gewinnen bei diesem Casino. - No-Go-Areas in Deutschland

Noch wenige Wochen vor der Landtagswahl versucht das Innenministerium die unliebsame Entercash einzufangen, indem bei einem eigens anberaumten Abendtermin der versammelten Landespresse ein Bezirksbeamter aus der Dortmunder Nordstadt und ein Sozialarbeiter aus Essen-Altenessen Solitär Klassik werden.
No Go Areas In Deutschland A "no-go area" or a "no-go zone" is an area in a town or region that is barricaded off to civil or military authorities by a force such as a paramilitary, or an area that is barred to certain individuals or limangallery.com term has also been used to refer to areas: Undergoing insurgency where the ruling authorities have lost control and are unable to enforce their sovereignty;. 8/1/ · Germany is now home to the largest number of immigrants ( million) of any member state of the European Union. In the whole of Europe this sort of "no go" areas are established, but facts. 4/2/ · EUROPE has nearly a thousand 'no-go' areas where authorities have simply lost control due to the high number of immigrants, it was sensationally . Bautzen punktet mit touristischen Perlen, perfekter Infrastruktur und vielem mehr! No-Go-Areas in Deutschland: In diese Viertel traut sich selbst die Polizei nicht. | Angriffe auf Polizisten. dpa/Carsten Rehder Auch bei. Der Begriff No-go-Area bzw. No-go-Zone entstammt der Militärterminologie und steht dort für Übergriffen schützen und plante daher, zur Fußball-​Weltmeisterschaft eine Karte mit den No-go-Areas in Deutschland vorzulegen. Duisburg-Marxloh und Berlin-Neukölln In Deutschland gibt es No-Go-Areas, behaupten Populisten. Ein Ortsbesuch. Sind Duisburg-Marxloh.
No Go Areas In Deutschland

Facebooktwitterredditpinterestlinkedinmail

0 Kommentare

Schreibe einen Kommentar

Deine E-Mail-Adresse wird nicht veröffentlicht. Erforderliche Felder sind mit * markiert.